Designer Clothing

Designer Clothing News




 

 

Designer Clothing News Archive

27-Jan-2009

 

Man, what a bargain (Los Angeles Times)
What could be more macho than stalking thrift stores for deals on Designer Clothing? It cost me $44.93 to look like a million bucks.

Raleigh designer invited to Charleston Fashion Week (The News & Observer)
It looks as if Raleigh will be represented in one of South Carolina's biggest fashion events.

Man charged with stealing ?Lipstick? clothes (MSNBC)
A stage manager for "Lipstick Jungle"  has been charged with stealing $30,000 of designer bags and clothing from the television show and trying to sell them on eBay.

Lipstick Jungle theft (Sunshine Coast Daily)
A stage manager has been charged with stealing $US30,000 (about $A45,000) worth of designer bags and clothing from the US television show Lipstick Jungle.

Resellers, charities hit with new child?s clothing requirements (Reporter-Times)
INDIANAPOLIS ? Resale business owners Tamara MacKenzie of Kidz Zone in Mooresville and Betty Daniels of Designer Consigner in Decatur Township say it?s the absolute worst time for the federal government to slap new safety requirements on children?s toys and clothing.

Where to find designer jeans at up to 80% off this weekend (ABC 15 Phoenix)
Designer clothes are great, but who has the money for them? If you like Designer Clothing you?ll definitely want to head out to Scottsdale for the Warehouse Sale this weekend.

Back to Designer Clothing

Back to Designer Clothing News Archive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The articles and content provided on this website have been contributed by guest authors, and may not reflect the views, opinions, thoughts or beliefs of http://www.designer-clothing.org/ or its staff. We are not responsible for copyright infringements by columnists, writers and authors. We do not necessarily endorse or promote the services, advice or products by, from and mentioned by any authors, writers or columnists. http://www.designer-clothing.org/ will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by a user through the user's reliance on information and advice gained through the articles, interviews, stories, columns, and any and all writings viewed on this website.